Advertising intimacy relationship marketing and the services consumer

advertising intimacy relationship marketing and the services consumer

To investigate possible linkages between the relationship marketing activities of “Advertising intimacy: relationship marketing and the services consumer”. Advertising Intimacy: Relationship Marketing and. The Services Consumer. Barbara B. Stern. The article proposes intimacy theory as the basis of services. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Advertising Intimacy: Relationship Marketing and the Services Consumer | The article proposes intimacy theory as the.

Finally, the first contribution of this study is that marketers can establish an intimate relationship between consumer and brand is affirmed. Secondly, the authors suggest that intimacy plays a pivotal role building a good Consumer-brand relationship so that the intimacy can help in creating a competitive advantage for brands.

The second article that will be analyzed in this paper is Advertising Intimacy: Relationship Marketing and The Services Consumer. Stern had proposed the intimacy theory as the basis of services relationships communicated by advertising and suggest that intimacy approach is more suitable for services marketing situations than others theories e.

The author focused the attention on the attributes or features that can be shared by intimate relationship including; communication self-disclosurecomfort compatibilitycommitment bonding with the consumerconflict resolution trustand caring giving. He argues that the intimacy attributes exist no matter the degree of the relationship between consumer and brand, and they appear in services advertising as message themes and consumer benefits.

After the author presented a brief description of the five attributes, he proposes a model of the intimate relationship cycle. It consists four stages that the consumer follow: These responses are constructive and destructive responses.

advertising intimacy relationship marketing and the services consumer

The first group is constructive responses which include: The consumers attempt to change the relationship rather than to escape from it; and b Loyalty: In this case, the relationship remains extant because the consumer is waiting and hoping that the situation will improve.

In contrast, the destructive responses include: Our research suggests that RM has had the unin- exchange relationships. This finding is substantiated by sugges- Smith and Higgins,p. Specifically, a tension emerges from the communication of altruistic concerns by many organ- izations, against the backdrop of the recognized need for 8. Implications and conclusions profit maximization.

advertising intimacy relationship marketing and the services consumer

As a result, the creation of RM has sown the tinues to espouse the benefits of RM from an organiza- seeds of new problems, as well as new opportunities for tional perspective. In particular, research that investigates marketing.

Organizations that wish to engage in RM in a consumer experiences of relational strategies by different mass market context should consider how their strategies types of firm, and in different countries, would be insight- might result in unintended consequences. The use of various ful. Consequently, the views context.

Further insights into how consumers regard con- of Fournier et al. They will need to work hard to overcome perceptions the point of view of an important, but greatly underrepre- that RM exists only at the level of discourse see Fitchett sented, constituent—the consumer. The findings presented and McDonagh, ; Sturdy et al. This has here suggest that, although popular, RM may have failed in important implications for customer communications, in promoting a more positive image for marketing.

While it is particular, and more fundamentally requires a whole demonstrably simple to appropriate relational language to rethinking of contemporary marketing systems.

As such, convey cooperation, mutuality, and trust between a firm and this goes beyond the remit of any individual organization. In doing so, firms must be cognizant that RM is not a strategy that can be created; it is a position that must Acknowledgements be lived.

We thank Maurice Patterson and Pierre McDonagh and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier Overall then, informants are concerned with the lengths drafts of this manuscript. They view company actions in key areas with suspicion and do not believe that they engage in actions References for the simple good of the consumer.

Beyond the frills of relationship marketing | Lisa O'Malley and andrea prothero - mephistolessiveur.info

Critical theory and consumer marketing. Scand J Manage personal relationship are huge and consumers can feel ;10 3: A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. J Mark ;54 January: Reflections on relationship marketing in consumer markets. This paper has provided much needed empirical data on J Acad Mark Sci ;23 4: Health Educ Q Kotler P. Explores the new marketing paradigm. Mark Sci Inst Rev ;14 4: Conceptual metaphors in everyday language.

Perspectives on services marketing. American Mar- Philos ;8 August: Sloan Manage Rev ; Fall: The Free Press; Buchanan R, Gilles CS. Eur Manage J ;8 4: Manage Serv ; August: Focus groups and the nature of qualitative marketing research.

advertising intimacy relationship marketing and the services consumer

A meaning based model of advertising experiences. J Consum Res ;19 December: Focus groups as qualitative research. Qualitative research meth- practice. Sloan Manage Rev ; Summer: J Bus Res ; Relationship quality in services selling: J Mark ;54 July: Service encounters and service relationships: Int J Advert ;17 4: The utility of the relationship metaphor in consumer Deighton J, Grayson K.

J Mark Manage ; J Consum Res ;21 4: Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Eur J Mark ;34 7: J Mark Man- Desmond J. Marketing and the war machine.

Mark Intell Plann ;15 7: Designing a customer retention plan. J Bus Strategy ; privacy concerns. J Mark Commun ;3 3: Developing buyer — seller relationships. J Mark 40 6: Do you want to keep your customers for- Fischer E. A postmodern analysis of the implications of the discourse of mass ever? Harv Bus Rev ; March — April: The incorporation of an interactive Maclaran P, Stevens L, editors. J Strateg Mark ;7: J Mark Strategy ;8 2: Bus Rev ;69 September — October: Preventing the premature death of relation- Ritson M, Elliott R.

The social uses of advertising: Harv Bus Rev ; January — February: J Consum Res ;26 3: Gabriel Y, Lang T. Exploiting niches using relationship marketing.

J Bus Strategy ;6 4: The group depth interview.

The Future of Agency-Client Relationships

J Mark ;26 3: The fundamentals of relationships: From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Manage Decis ;32 2: J Acad Mark Sci ;23 4: Reconsidering the relationship analogy. J Mark Man- Res ; Ethical and legal foundations of relational mar- Stern BB. J Mark ;57 October: J Advert ;26 Winter: Applied qualitative Tesch R. The Falmer Press; Heide JB, John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Metaphors and competitive advantage: J Bus Res ; tial-phenomenology.

J Consum Res ;16 September: A review of the marriage analogy in relationship marketing. Winning and keeping industrial customers. Relationship marketing and distribution channels. J Acad Jones C. Allen G, Skinner C, editors. Hand- Mar Sci ;23 4: The Falmer Westin A.