When a thesis and antithesis meet they often form a
reasoning, where thesis and antithesis are combined into a synthesis, is a .. a higher integration level, one that allows employees as a group to meet the. As time goes by, maybe Synthesis grows until thesis and antithesis fall away. then swept up into one of the three piles when viewpoints meet/polarize. Synthesis You're talking about a Hegelian dialectic. The triad is usually described in the following way: The thesis is an intellectual proposition.
The matter is due to his peculiar terminology and style; they are undoubtedly involved and complicated, and seem excessively abstract. Theodor Haering's monumental and standard work has for the first time cleared up the linguistic problem. Hegel's contemporaries were immediately baffled, because what was clear to him was not clear to his readers, who were not initiated into the genesis of his terms. An example of how a legend can grow on inept reading is this: The most vexing and devastating Hegel legend is that everything is thought in "thesis, antithesis, and synthesis.
Think Classical: Hegel and the Myth of the Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis Dialectical Scheme
Here, in Chapter 2, Marx is obsessed by the word "thesis";  it forms an important part of the basis for the Marxist theory of history. Rogerian argument In modern times, the dialectic of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis has been implemented across the world as a strategy for organizing expositional writing.
For example, this technique is taught as a basic organizing principle in French schools: Almost from day one, students are taught to produce plans for their compositions, and are graded on them. The structures change with fashions. Youngsters were once taught to express a progression of ideas. Now they follow a dialectic model of thesis-antithesis-synthesis. If you listen carefully to the French arguing about any topic they all follow this model closely: This analytical mode of reasoning is integrated into the entire school corpus.
Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis has also been used as a basic scheme to organize writing in the English language. Eventually, people learn to discard their old mental anchors and boundaries -- all the facts and certainties that built firm convictions.
They become like boats adrift, always ready to shift with the changing winds and currents. From Small Groups and the Dialectic Process: Today's facilitated small groups or teams are not like the old Bible studies many of us attended years ago. Back then, we discussed the Bible and its wonderful truths; now people dialogue until they reach an emotional form of unity based on "empathy" for diverse views and values.
Robert Klench describes the process: Briefly, the Hegelian dialectic process works like this: The new synthesis becomes the starting point thesis for the next meeting, and the process of continual change innovation continues. The fear of man rejection overrides the fear of God. The end result is a 'paradigm shift' in how one processes factual information.
Today, his compromising philosophy and transformational process are changing churches as well as politics, education, business and communities. Through their hierarchical system of soviets groups led by trained facilitators who led the group dialogue toward a prescribed and evolving consensus.
Everyone had to trade individual thinking for collective thinking and communal values. The vision of "common good" was simply the carrot that justified total and cruel control. See When Iron Gates Yield. Like the mythical Phoenix rising out of its ashes, the UN emerged from the fiery devastation of World War II as a beacon of light to utopian humanists and their hopeful followers.
When a thesis and antithesis meet, they often form a(n):?
Within two years after Communist leader Alger Hiss presided over its birth, some of its most powerful agencies had been established. Its purpose and Its Philosophyhe wrote: You may categorize the two philosophies as two super-nationalisms, or as individualism versus collectivism Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? East and West will not agree on a basis of the future if they merely hurl at each other the fixed ideas of the past.
For that is what dogma's are -- the crystallizations of some dominant system of thought If we are to achieve progress, we must learn to uncrystalize our dogmas. He summarized his socialist philosophy at a US conference on mental health. His message was published by the now prestigious magazine Psychiatry, and by his Communist friend, Alger Hiss in the socialist magazine, International Conciliation.
Notice the obstacles to "mental health": Many of them are easy to list -- prejudice, isolationism, the ability to emotionally and uncritically to believe unreasonable things For many generations we have bowed our necks to the yoke of the conviction of sin. We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers Whatever the cost, we must learn to live in friendliness and peace with That's why Biblical Christianity was -- and continues to be -- incompatible with the world's standards for "mental health.Karl Marx - The Dialectic Process
They know that the main obstacle to global solidarityis God's uncompromising Word. They cannot build "a single world culture" without first undermining absolute Truth. After all, that's why Christians were persecuted in the Soviet Union and other Communist countries! Raymond Houghton, who envisions a world managed through the subtle but manipulative collective "dialogue.
The critical point of behavior control, in effect, is sneaking up on mankind without his self-conscious realization that a crisis is at hand. It tells us that-- "The challenge to humanity is to adopt new ways of thinking, new ways of acting, new ways of organizing itself in society, in short, new ways of living.
The new, subjective postmodern ways are in. Already trained to follow feelings rather than facts and peer culture rather than parental counsel today's youth are marching happily toward an amoral, permissive at least for the moment collective society. Many have already internalized the ground rules for the dialectic process: Seek "common ground" in the midst of today's diversity Show respect, tolerance and appreciation for all beliefs and values unless they reflect Biblical truth.
- Thesis, antithesis, synthesis
Train everyone to share their feelings, listen empathetically, and identify with opposing views, then blissfully flow with the group consensus. This process transforms individual thinkers into group thinkers. Since the sense of belonging feels good, the threat of group disapproval inhibits members from voicing "offensive" views.
Nothing is absolute; everything is changing in a preplanned direction. So would the rest of the world. This social transformation is well under way, and the masses simply flow with the change.
Planned over a century ago, the framework for managing and monitoring this worldwide revolution was in place by From Justifying Mind Control: Inthe infamous Soviet spy published Chisholm's message on mental health in his socialist journal, International Conciliation. Hiss, then president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, added his own Preface which showed the involvement of the Rockefeller Foundation in the mental health movement.
Rees had envisioned a global NGO non-governmental organization that would network with political and civic leaders around the world. His leadership led to the birth of the World Federation for Mental Health in It would "enjoy consultative relationship with several UN agencies and It is the men and women in whom these patterns of attitude and behaviour have been incorporated who present the immediate resistance to social, economic and political changes.
Thus, prejudice, hostility or excessive nationalism may become deeply embedded in the developing personality Nations around the world are fast conforming to the pattern set in the s.
The global network of "mental health" partners is working to prevent anything that would hinder "positive" collective thinking in the rising global village Mass immigration planned back in the s and multicultural conflicts have added to the urgency, and the intentional crisis has helped promote pre-planned solutions.
Today, strategies for social change such as group thinking, conflict resolution, consensus building and continual compromise are becoming the norm. All are based on the dialectic process used in the former Soviet Union to conform minds to Soviet ideology Anything but the Truth: Islam may not match the UN model for a global spirituality, but its spreading influence makes it a useful tool in the hands of change agents Remember the Hegelian dialectic consensus process.
The class discusses a provocative story or experience. The students share their thoughts, feelings and ideas in the group. Everyone must seek "common ground" and empathize with contrary ideas. Factual rebuttals that might offend a group member are forbidden. Throughout the dialogue, a trained facilitator guides the group back on track if it deviates from its course toward the prescribed consensus or group conclusion. When feel-good Islamic suggestions become part of this mix, they help shift the consensus a little further away from any Christian position.
How many 7th graders are strong enough in their faith to disagree with a group conclusion that Allah and God are the same? Who dares to express the uniqueness of Christ, when even Prince Charlesfirst in line to the British throne, says, "We share as Muslims and Christians a powerful core of spiritual belief - in one divine God"?
This tactic -- used years ago to indoctrinate Soviet children with Communist ideology -- now pressures children from Christian homes to "open their minds" to new religious blends. Islam becomes a stepping stone, not an end. It broadens the options.